Mercurial > pub > dyncall > dyncall
changeset 250:7cb8a0aaf638
- note about c99 (+ anon struct/union) requirements in doc
| author | Tassilo Philipp |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 14 May 2017 00:19:15 +0200 |
| parents | 91db39538e78 |
| children | 3f7c69fadfc3 |
| files | ToDo doc/manual/manual_overview.tex dyncall/dyncall.3 dyncallback/dyncallback.3 dynload/dynload.3 |
| diffstat | 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ToDo Sat May 13 23:02:17 2017 +0200 +++ b/ToDo Sun May 14 00:19:15 2017 +0200 @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ prototype exist (e.g. just calling some pointer), without any declaration... even possible in C, as one has to cast to the function type? need to support? -- Add doc note (and on website) on dyncall's c standard compatibility, which is c99 + anon struct extension - - make sure all assembly files declare (or are built) by setting the noexecstack flag, compared to translating code with gcc, it's manual for the assembler; this depends on arch support (currently it's only done for x86/x64 ELF, but doesn't always work I think... e.g. openbsd 4.0, maybe too old?):
--- a/doc/manual/manual_overview.tex Sat May 13 23:02:17 2017 +0200 +++ b/doc/manual/manual_overview.tex Sun May 14 00:19:15 2017 +0200 @@ -178,3 +178,10 @@ \caption{Supported platforms}% \end{table} +\subsection{Build Requirements} + +The library needs at least a c99 compiler with additional support for anonymous +structs/unions (which were introduced officially in c11). Given that those are +generally supported by pretty much all major c99 conforming compilers (as +default extension), it should build fine with a c99 toolchain. +
--- a/dyncall/dyncall.3 Sat May 13 23:02:17 2017 +0200 +++ b/dyncall/dyncall.3 Sun May 14 00:19:15 2017 +0200 @@ -187,6 +187,13 @@ r = dcCallDouble(vm, (DCpointer)&sqrt); dcFree(vm); .Ed +.Sh CONFORMING TO +The dyncall library needs at least a c99 compiler with additional support for +anonymous structs/unions (which were introduced officially in c11). Given that +those are generally supported by pretty much all major c99 conforming compilers +(as default extension), it should build fine with a c99 toolchain. Strictly +speaking, dyncall conforms to c11, though. +.Ed .Sh SEE ALSO .Xr dyncallback 3 , .Xr dynload 3
--- a/dyncallback/dyncallback.3 Sat May 13 23:02:17 2017 +0200 +++ b/dyncallback/dyncallback.3 Sun May 14 00:19:15 2017 +0200 @@ -123,6 +123,13 @@ (123, 23.f, 3, 1.82, 9909ll); dcbFreeCallback(cb); .Ed +.Sh CONFORMING TO +The dyncallback library needs at least a c99 compiler with additional support +for anonymous structs/unions (which were introduced officially in c11). Given +that those are generally supported by pretty much all major c99 conforming +compilers (as default extension), it should build fine with a c99 toolchain. +Strictly speaking, dyncall conforms to c11, though. +.Ed .Sh SEE ALSO .Xr dyncall 3 , .Xr dynload 3